This Story really, really bothers me. The US military is requiring service dog handlers in their service to have dogs only provided to them by certain organizations approved by Assistance Dogs International. This is blocking mentally wounded soldiers from dogs they NEED who do their JOBS. It doesn't matter where you get a dog or who trained it as long as it does its tasks properly. Sadly, it can cost upwards of $13,000 for a dog provided by an organization, as opposed to the under a thousand dollars getting a dog to train yourself can cost. Even private dog trainers charge less to help than the high rates "approved" organizations can charge. Seeing eye dogs arguably need the intensive training methods in a facility that ADI requires, but psychiatric dogs are much, much more easily trained. I got Nibbler when he was 8 months old and he was fully working for me and public access ready at a year old. Adara came to us at 3 months and was also ready around her first birthday.
I would fully support a dog being allowed on base only if the handler and dog could complete a public access test similar to what
Psychdog has. Simple, basic tasks to prove the dog is fully trained and capable. Have every handler on base spend half an hour demonstrating the readiness of the dogs. Rules like this only serve to make the lives of disabled people HARDER.
Our soldiers with mental and physical injuries from war have already given enough for their country. Why make them give up their medically necessary dog because the "right" people didn't provide them? It's like getting brand-specific about a prosthetic leg.
ADI advocates training like the training given to guide dogs and other dogs who hold the handler's life 100% in their hands because they openly don't think that psychiatric dogs are "real" service dogs. It's the sort of elitism that makes it harder to have a service dog legitimately. If all service dog organizations would spend the time they set aside to trying to seem elitist (not all of them do this) and put it into educating the public, things would be a LOT easier. The ADA is explicit in what a service animal is, and what sort of tasks define a service animal. THESE are the guidelines to enforce and tell the public about, not some imaginary elitist ones.
Handler-trained dogs can do their job just as well as a program-trained dog. I want to know why ADI wants to put an unnecessary burden on the disabled unless we'll join THEIR club.